Performance Audits (Business-Readable)
Lab + field reading, money-page prioritization, and effort-ranked recommendations you can approve without drowning in red Lighthouse bars.
// performance.optimize()
Available for hireSlow pages tax every ad dollar and every SEO visit. I offer a website performance optimization service that measures lab and field data, ranks fixes by revenue impact, and ships remediation on React, Next.js, and Astro frontends — without a cosmetic redesign that stays slow.
From audit-only clarity for founders to full frontend remediation and rebuild planning.
Lab + field reading, money-page prioritization, and effort-ranked recommendations you can approve without drowning in red Lighthouse bars.
Image/font strategy, script deferral, layout shift fixes, and main-thread work reduction on templates that drive leads or sales.
Bundle analysis, Server/Client boundary fixes, route-level code splitting, and hydration cost cuts on App Router or SPA shells.
If the stack cannot meet a budget, I plan Astro/Next migrations with SEO-safe redirects — after proving quick wins are exhausted.
If any of these sound familiar, performance work is probably cheaper than buying more traffic.
Ad relevance is fine; LCP and INP are not. We harden the landing templates that spend the budget.
Field data is red while desktop lab screenshots look fine. We prioritize real-user failing pages.
Chat, tag managers, and heatmaps quietly destroy INP. We add a script policy and load strategies.
Pretty redesigns reintroduce the same sins. Budgets and measurement become acceptance criteria.
Measure → triage → ship wins → decide on architecture. No blind rewrite on day one.
Lighthouse/WebPageTest + Search Console/CrUX focus on homepage, top landers, and checkout/lead pages.
Quick wins vs structural vs architecture. Effort, risk, and expected impact in writing.
Implement high-ROI items with staging validation. Protect analytics and forms while changing load order.
Before/after lab, watch field CWV, document budgets so marketing does not re-break the site next month.
// hire.now()
Send your top landing URLs and whether you have Search Console access. I will outline an audit or remediation sprint sized to impact — not fear.
Start a ProjectFrontend performance across the stacks I already ship in production.
Portfolio examples where speed was part of the product, not an afterthought.
Near-zero JS content delivery with a 100 Lighthouse performance score — proof that design-heavy sites can still be fast.
SSR/ISR ecommerce architecture aimed at sub-1s LCP across routes — performance treated as a store requirement.
Typically a baseline audit, prioritized fix list, implementation of agreed items, and before/after proof on key URLs. Larger rebuilds are optional follow-ons after triage — not assumed.
Optimization targets speed and responsiveness metrics. Visual redesign can happen later or in parallel, but many conversion wins come from remediating the current site first.
Yes for audits and many frontend/asset/script fixes. If the platform cannot meet budgets, I document that and outline Astro/Next migration options with SEO precautions.
Image, font, and script quick wins often land within days. Deep JavaScript architecture work takes longer. Field CWV updates in Search Console can lag behind lab improvements.
I target strong mobile scores and passing CWV where the stack allows. Third-party requirements and product complexity can make “100 everywhere” unrealistic — I set honest budgets per template.
// contact.init()
// status.check()
Available for freelance — US/UK/EU clients preferred.
Full projects, hourly, and retainers welcome.
// message.compose()
message.sent()
I'll respond within 24 hours.
Something went wrong. Please try again.
No spam · Project details stay confidential · NDA available on request